feliscattus's Profile

feliscattus On 5 days ago

About Me

  • Birthday: Apr 28, 1935
  • Gender: Male
  • Home: Opelousas, La.
  • Status: single
  • AIM: fancyclover
  • Yahoo: w5tjz
  • Blog Traffic: 1,021 Visitors

Recent Posts:

Browse by Category

The Universe

March 9, 2005 / by feliscattus

I often think about the origin of the Universe, with no religious connection. If it could have evolved spontaneously, and if there could be complete nothingness at one time and if nothingness is possible. If there was empty space, then empty space is something. Is space infinite? According to Big Bang theory, time did not exist before it occurred. This is very difficult to imagine. I cannot accept a supernatural creation of the universe or anything supernatural.

2 comments on The Universe

  • anacoana said 1 years ago
    Might enjoy reading about her research...Lisa Randall, special Topics correspondent Gary Taubes recently spoke with Dr. Lisa Randall about her highly cited work in brane theory. In our analysis of brane research over the past decade, Dr. Randall has eight papers cited a total of 1,038 times, ranking her among the top 15 scientists in this specialized area. Two of these papers are in the top 10. In ISI Essential Science Indicators Web product, Dr. Randall has 63 papers listed, cited a total of 2,479 times, in the field of Physics. Dr. Randall is Professor of Physics at Harvard University, where her research is concentrated in the area of particle physics
    http://www.esi-topics.com/brane/interviews/DrLisaRandall.html

    excerpt>> the universe we live in is the Planck brane, which localizes the graviton. Another is that we live on a second brane, which is the case where we discussed the hierarchy problem. We generally assume that we live on a brane, but it may not be the brane on which gravity is concentrated. Suppose that gravity is highly concentrated near what I'll call the Planck brane. So gravity is concentrated on one brane, the Planck brane, and we live on a second brane, not precisely on top of the first brane but a little apart. Gravity on our second brane would appear to be weak. And that's precisely what we wanted to explain: why gravity appears to be so weak. That's the hierarchy problem—why gravity is so weak. And this follows from the key insight that we don't actually have to talk about how to get a huge mass scale; we can talk about why gravity is so weak.
    Physics: Lisa Randall - Who's Next - Newsweek - MSNBC.com
    Looking at the Earth's tiniest particles to explain the mysteries of the cosmos.
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10510773/site/newsweek/ -
  • feliscattus said 1 years ago
    Way above my head, but will look into it. ty for reply.

Add a comment

To add comments without entering your email and image verification, you must be logged in. Login or Join Blogster

  • Type the words in the box below the image.

Email this blog post to a friend

To email posts to friends, you must be logged in. Login or Join Blogster

Friends

View All